• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

An estimate that arrives instantly should be treated as a red flag rather than good service. A competent team will come back with a list of questions: about users and volumes. A vendor that quotes without asking anything is probably pricing a guess, and that guess will be corrected later — and you will pay for it.

Look out for a gap difference between livewire and react the people you meet and the hire mobile app developers actually assigned. Ask for specific people rather than roles in the agreement, with wording that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A team that only offers roles and never names individuals is preserving the right to assign anyone it likes.

Insist on access to the repository from day one. A team that shows code only at milestones is inviting you to trust a black box. Visible commits show you how many people are really working far better than any status report. The same applies to the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, promises about quality are unverifiable.

Ambiguous contract language around code ownership is never an oversight. The contract should state plainly that all deliverables transfer to your business upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at which country's law applies and how payments are structured: heavy prepayment with nothing due in return for weeks removes any leverage you would otherwise keep.

Lastly, look at the working rhythm. Establish what overlap the teams will share each day, which person handles day-to-day questions and within what time. Four hours of overlap is normally sufficient; zero overlap converts a five-minute question into a lost day. Unclear written communication in the early emails rarely improves later.